[jja-announce] Act by 9/30,
to claim $s for infringements of yr electronic copyrights
Jazzmandel at aol.com
Jazzmandel at aol.com
Wed Sep 21 17:55:03 EDT 2005
Dear JJA members --
As many of us have written for Down Beat, and some of us have written for
other magazines that supplied our materials without our permission to online
databases that sold our works without recompense to us, I'm forwarding this note
from the National Writers Union to everyone. To take advantage of the
settlement or remedy of the NWU's successful case taken to the Supreme Court, YOU MUST
ACT BY SEPT. 30. You may register for recompense (probably at the $5 per
article rate, unless you registered your copyright of articles with the Library of
Congress) or you may do nothing, which cedes yr electronic rights to the
databases. The remedy leaves a lot to be desired, as you can read on Irv Muchnik's
blog http://freelancerights.blogspot.com/ and to apply for the funds you may
be due is a painful, time consuming process. But all this is detailed below.
Another way to foil electronic databases that charge fees to readers of yr
work is to post your work for free (you can do this at Jazzhouse.org, for one
site) or for a lower fee than the databases charge on your own website.
Please read on -- the NWU has done as best it could, and the info below ought
to be fairly clear --
best, Howard
If you've freelanced for Down Beat, you may know that
Down Beat articles were appearing on Highbeam.com
without your permission.
As many of you know, pursuant to the Supreme Court's
NY Times vs. Tasini decision, unless electronic rights
are specifically ceded in a written contract,
freelancer's retain their electronic rights and
publishers must negotiate electronic uses (such as
database licensing) separately.
Like literally thousands of other magazines, Down Beat
licensed freelancer's work without securing electronic
rights from the authors. Because this is a clear case
of copyright infringement, you may be entitled to
compensation through a Class Action Settlement.
Background:
In August 2000, the National Writers Union (NWU),
American Society for Journalists and Authors (ASJA)
and the Authors Guild, along with 21 freelance writers
brought forth a class action copyright infringement
lawsuit against several commercial electronic
databases and print publishers. They claimed that many
publishers and database companies (such as Reed
Elsevier's LEXIS/NEXIS and Dow Jones's Factiva) had
infringed the copyrights of thousands of freelance
contributors to newspapers, magazines, and other print
publications. As it turns out, literally, hundreds of
magazines and newspapers were licensing freelance
works to commercial databases without receiving
permission and thus were infringing on freelancers'
copyrights. Down Beat was one of them.
The Settlement:
The class action suit, subject to a fairness hearing
on September 27, 2005, will most likely be settled.
The settlement calls for a minimum of $10 million and
a maximum of $18 million to be paid to freelance
writers whose copyrights were infringed by the
defendants.
While many writers have expressed concerns about the
settlement - concerns I won't go into here - it does
provide freelancers the ability to receive some
financial compensation from publishers and database
companies who exploited their work without securing
electronic rights from the writers and without
providing any compensation to the writers.
The details of the class action settlement can be
found here:
http://copyrightclassaction.com/faq.php3
The staggering list of publications participating in
the class action settlement can be found here:
http://cert.gardencitygroup.com/edb/fs/publications
You will see that Down Beat is listed here:
http://cert.gardencitygroup.com/edb/fs/publications?list=highbeam&l=5
and here:
http://cert.gardencitygroup.com/edb/fs/publications?list=&l=5
If you have a claim - and if you've freelanced for
Down Beat or one of thousands of other publications in
the past several years you probably do - then you need
to fill out and submit the claim form no later than
September 30, 2005.
If you do not fill out the claim, not only will you
not receive any money out of the settlement, but also
due to a quirky provision in the settlement, you will
actually give the publishers and databases a
non-exclusive license by default.
The amount of money you will receive per article
ranges from $5 - $1,500, depending on how much you
sold the article for and whether or not you registered
your work with the US Copyright Office.
Your Claim Options:
If you have a claim, you're options at the moment are:
1) Fill out the claim form, give the defendants
non-exclusive rights to use your work electronically
and receive some compensation.
2) Fill out the claim form, deny the defendants
non-exclusive rights to use your work electronically
and receive 35% less compensation than if you give
them non-exclusive use (this takedown option is
particularly important if you see a future market for
your work being compromised by the defendants' use of
your work).
3) Do nothing. This will give the defendants a
non-exclusive license by default.
The date to opt-out of the settlement has passed.
If you have questions about this settlement, let me
know. I'll try to answer them as best I can. The
settlement is very confusing and who knows if it will
survive the fairness hearing or any appeals from
objectors (one of whom is a contract advisor for the
NWU).
The settlement was a hot topic at the National Writers
Union's Delegate Assembly in Baltimore last weekend,
and, as co-chair of the NWU's Journalism Division,
I've been fielding some questions about the
settlement.
More information about the settlement can be found
here:
http://www.nwu.org/class_action.htm
The views of writer Irv Muchnick who is an objector to
the settlement can found here:
http://freelancerights.blogspot.com/
More information about the National Writers Union,
which provides grievance and contract advice to its
members for no charge, can be found here:
http://www.nwu.org
Best,
Paul MacArthur
Co-Chair
NWU Journalism Division
nwujwriter at yahoo.com
More information about the jja-announce
mailing list